Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Jude v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv00116
Plaintiff:
Steven Jude
Defendant:
The City of New York, Joseph Ponte, Nadene Pinnock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jude v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv08735
Plaintiff:
Steven Jude
Defendant:
The City of New York, Joseph Ponte, Nadene Pinnock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv01824
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Gonzalez
Defendant:
The City of New York, Marshal, Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jude v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
Steven Jude
Defendant:
The City of New York, Joseph Ponte, Helath and Hospital Corp. ("HHC") and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGovern v. Woods et al
as 6:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
Tom McGovern
Defendant:
Tom Woods, Sherie Bilodeau, Connie Winner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alke v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2016cv00845
Plaintiff:
Erik Alke
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Steven Racette, Richard Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Hensley et al
as 3:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
Tony Roberts
Defendant:
S. Hensley, E. Mandoza, N. Sabti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vitrano v. Samuels et al
as 5:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Vitrano
Defendant:
Charles Samuels , Jr., J.F. Caraway, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roberts v. Hensley et al
as 3:2015cv01871
Plaintiff:
Tony Roberts
Defendant:
S. Hensley, N. Hipp, A. Malek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2015at00622
Plaintiff:
Rachel Simmons
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Rodriguez, Correctional Officer Hall, Sergeant Luis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
