Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Nash #406338 v. Washington et al
as 1:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Brent Nash #406338
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Dana Nessel, Meg Zamora and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nash #406338 v. Washington et al
as 1:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Brent James Nash #406338
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Dana Nessel, A. Bryce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00849
Plaintiff:
Antrel Vonique Brown, Antrell Vonique Brown, Islamic Ali and others
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, State Department of Corrections, Dana Nessel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. State of Michigan et al
as 9:2021cv00764
Plaintiff:
Antrel Vonique Brown
Defendant:
State of Michigan, State Department of Corrections, Dana Nessel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Eastern District of California et al
as 9:2021cv00709
Defendant:
Clerks, Dancks, Eastern District of California and others
Plaintiff:
Antrel Vonique Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffith #165268 v. Huss et al
as 2:2021cv00084
Defendant:
Erica Huss, Joe Biden, Dana Nessel and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon J. Griffith #165268
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timmons v. Vashawn
as 2:2021cv10715
Petitioner:
Jerrico Keyshon Timmons
Respondent:
Dana Nessel
Defendant:
Robert Vashaw
Williams #225280 v. Carlson et al
as 2:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Richard D. Russell, Michael R. Dean, Dana Nessel and others
Plaintiff:
Donnell Williams #225280
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv10133
Petitioner:
Christopher Robinson
Respondent:
Dana Nessel, Michigan Department of Corrections and J. Franks
Calhoun #379175 v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00666
Plaintiff:
Samuel Eugene Calhoun #379175
Defendant:
William P. Barr, Dana Nessel, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
