Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Richardson v. Gray
as 5:2012hc02301
Petitioner: David Louis Richardson
Respondent: Lewis Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Gray et al
as 5:2012ct03108
Plaintiff: David Louis Richardson
Defendant: Lewis Gray, Corbett Respass, Sgt. Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. THOMPSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01238
Petitioner: DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Respondent: BRIAN THOMPSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Richardson v. Travis Outlaw We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-6750
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID LOUIS RICHARDSON
Respondent - Appellee: TRAVIS OUTLAW
Richardson v. Outlaw
as 5:2011hc02038
Petitioner: David Louis Richardson
Respondent: Travis Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Richardson v. Joseph Mazurkiewicz, et al
as 11-1161
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID DEWEES RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee: JOSEPH F. MAZURKIEWICZ and ATTY GEN PA
Richardson v. Outlaw
as 5:2010hc02201
Petitioner: David Louis Richardson
Respondent: Travis Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RICHARDSON v. MAZURKIEWICZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02502
Petitioner: DAVID DEWEES RICHARDSON
Respondent: JOSEPH F. MAZURKIEWICZ, JR. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Perry et al
as 5:2009ct03188
Plaintiff: David Louis Richardson
Defendant: Glenn Perry, T.F. Daugherty, T. Peaden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Richardson v. Ron Diehl
as 09-3627
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID DEWEES RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee: RON DIEHL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?