Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 97
Dooley v. Troyer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00202
Plaintiff: Dorris L Y Dooley
Defendant: Michelle Troyer, Callie Daniels and Elkhart County Superior Court 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOOLEY v. TROYER
as 1:2017cv04671
Plaintiff: DORRIS LATRESE YVETTE DOOLEY
Defendant: MICHELLE TROYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. PTS of America, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00603
Plaintiff: Rose M. Phillips , Michelle Myers and Brandon Green
Defendant: PTS of America, LLC , John Doe, Richard Haskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorris v. Sperfslage
as 4:2017cv00295
Petitioner: Dan L Dorris
Respondent: William Sperfslage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dorris v. Sperfslage
as 1:2017cv00090
Plaintiff: Dan L Dorris
Defendant: William Sperfslage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv02277
Petitioner: DORRIS L.Y. DOOLEY
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv02285
Petitioner: DORRIS L.Y. DOOLEY
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOOLEY v. SACKETT et al
as 1:2017cv01680
Defendant: THERESA AULA, PAMELA JOHNSON, JULIA MURPHY and others
Plaintiff: DORRIS DOOLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01619
Petitioner: DORRIS L Y DOOLEY
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01620
Petitioner: DORRIS L Y DOOLEY
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?