Cases 21 - 30 of 358
Easley v. Waters et al
as 3:2023cv03062
Plaintiff:
William Easley
Defendant:
Waters, Ryan Hughes and D. Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor (ID 40516) v. Easley
as 5:2023cv03203
Petitioner:
Ernest L. Taylor
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Tim Easley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Easley v. Nolan et al
as 3:2023cv01756
Plaintiff:
David Easley
Defendant:
Aaron J. Nolan, Robia Jones-Barringer, Lucas County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2023cv17721
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. Pike County Mississippi et al
as 5:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Chad Everette Easley
Defendant:
Pike County Mississippi, Pike County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff James Brumfield and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Easley v. Blocker, et al
as 23-12506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT EUGENE EASLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BLOCKER, PLISKIN, BOTTKAL and others
Easley v. Vogt et al
as 1:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Warren Easley
Defendant:
Lt. Vogt, Unit Manager Miller, Sgt. Carper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Easley v. Blocker, et al
as 23-12099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT EUGENE EASLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BLOCKER, PLISKIN, BOTTKAL, NURSE and others
Easley v. Young
as 5:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Chad Everette Easley
Defendant:
Warden Herbert Young
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Easley v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv02112
Plaintiff:
William Easley
Defendant:
Joseph C Garrett, Karl R Bradford and Darren D Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
