Cases 21 - 30 of 4,186
Florance v. Broome County et al
as 9:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Thomas Florance
Defendant:
Broome County, Frederick J. Akshar, Robert Charpinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Frederick
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Shasta Burton
Respondent:
Warden George Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hegel v. TDOC et al
as 1:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
James Frederick Hegel
Defendant:
TDOC, Jerrie Avery, Anna Parson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Mikeska et al
as 3:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Frederick Stone
Defendant:
Anton Mikeska and Tow Pro Wreckage Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01609
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent:
Julie Lynch, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, Frederick D Benton, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Houston v. Mr. Frederick et al
as 4:2024cv01252
Plaintiff:
Reddie Houston
Defendant:
Mr. Frederick, Corey Jones and Mr. Winfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooks v. Harris County Detention Officers et al
as 4:2024cv01251
Plaintiff:
Frederick Cooks Pierre and Frederick Pierre Cooks
Defendant:
Harris County Detention Officers, Officer Asegueda and Officer Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick v. Uhler
as 1:2024cv02513
Plaintiff:
Marquise Frederick
Defendant:
Donald J. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
