Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Grillo v. Duncan
as 1:2014cv08323
Petitioner:
Vincent Grillo
Respondent:
Steven Duncan and Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grillo v. Brighthaupt et al
as 3:2014cv00064
Plaintiff:
Matthew Grillo
Defendant:
Brighthaupt and J. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover v. Horvath et al
as 1:2013cv02729
Plaintiff:
Walter Glover
Defendant:
P. Horvath, S.C.I. - Waymart Mailroom, Laura Banta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRILLO et al v. OBAMA et al
as 2:2013cv04829
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GRILLO and MATTHEW TUCKER
Defendant:
BARACK H. OBAMA, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and CHRISTOPHER CHRISTIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KRAMER v. THE CITY OF NEW KENSINGTON et al
as 2:2013cv00606
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KRAMER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW KENSINGTON, THE NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPT., ANTHONY GRILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lafitte v. Grillo
as 3:2012cv01422
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lafitte
Respondent:
Evelio Grillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eugene Rutledge v. County of Alameda, et al
as 10-15380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE DARREL RUTLEDGE
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, ALAMEDA COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, DIANE BELLAS and others
Barrett v. Cate et al
as 1:2009cv01741
Plaintiff:
Robert E Barrett
Defendant:
M. Cate, I. Grillo, Robert Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutledge v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2009cv04228
Plaintiff:
Eugene Darrel Rutledge
Defendant:
County of Alameda, Alameda County Public Defender's Office, Diane Bellas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alex v. Beard et al
as 1:2009cv01711
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Alex
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, -, Andrea Priori Meintel, Joseph P. Nish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
