Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Carlos Castro v. Cal Terhune, et al
as 11-16837
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS CASTRO
Defendant - Appellee:
CAL TERHUNE, G. BONNIE GARIBAY, J. BATCHELOR and others
Glenn Lawhorn, Jr. v. Ayer
as 11-6870
Petitioner - Appellant:
GLENN CALVIN LAWHORN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
L. J. AYERS, Sheriff of Amherst County, JOHN DOE(S), Employees of Amherst County Sheriff's Office and Department, JANE DOE(S), Deputy Sheriffs and others
AYERS v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2011cv02396
Petitioner:
CLAYTON J. AYERS, III
Respondent:
JOHN MURRAY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lawhorn v. Ayers et al
as 7:2011cv00114
Defendant:
L. J. Ayers, Elton Blackstock, Jane Doe(s) and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Calvin Lawhorn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenn Lawhorn, Jr. v. L. J. Ayer
as 10-7584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN CALVIN LAWHORN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
L. J. AYERS, Sheriff, Amherst County Sheriff's Dept., ELTON BLACKSTOCK, Superintendent - Blue Ridge Regional Jail Authority and LYNCHBURG ADULT DETENTION CENTER
Lawhorn v. Ayers et al
as 7:2010cv00489
Defendant:
L. J. Ayers, Elton Blackstock and Lynchburg Adult Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Glenn Calvin Lawhorn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Fischer et al
as 1:2010cv03938
Plaintiff:
David Ryan
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Perez, L. Phipps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Ayers
as 1:2009cv00179
Petitioner:
Clement Brown
Respondent:
Robert J. Ayers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Ayers
as 3:2008cv05242
Petitioner:
Clement Brown
Respondent:
Robert J. Ayers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McDay v. Selsky et al
as 6:2008cv06407
Plaintiff:
Keith McDay
Defendant:
Donald Selsky, D. F. Napoli, J. Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
