Cases 21 - 30 of 98
Johnson v. Tomas
as 21-271
Defendant / Appellee:
N.P. K. Solotti, Lt. L. Tucker, Sgt. Royick and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Angelo D. Johnson
Defendant:
Chief Medical Deputy John Morley, individually and in their officical capacities, Mr. Ranieri, Commissioner Hearing Officer and Chief Medical Deputy John Morley, individually and in their official capacities
(PC) Gonzales v. Negrete et al
as 1:2020cv01493
Defendant:
Holguin, B. Negrete, Nuckles and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lightner v. Perez et al
as 6:2020cv06564
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervision, Superintendant Thoms, Danielle Snide and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Latif Lightner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Perez et al
as 6:2020cv06551
Defendant:
PA J. Perez, R.N. Jane Doe and Tomas
Plaintiff:
Angelo D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Tomas et al
as 6:2020cv06481
Defendant:
M.D., Sgt. Shields, PA J. Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC)Milliken v. Alfaro et al
as 1:2020cv00963
Defendant:
D. Goss, S. Alfaro and J. Perez
Plaintiff:
James M. Milliken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Milliken v. Alfaro et al
as 2:2020cv01350
Defendant:
D. Goss, S. Alfaro and J. Perez
Plaintiff:
James M. Milliken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daigle v. Perez et al
as 9:2020cv00128
Defendant:
Tony Andersen, Deeanne Andersen, Wayne A Grigsby and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mark Daigle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Brown et al
as 9:2020cv00622
Defendant:
C.O. P. Boule, Lt. G. Murphy, R.N. Christy and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daigle v. Dickerson et al
as 9:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Taliesin R Stern, Courtney R Rice, Christina Norris and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mark Daigle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
