Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Lieser v. Spencer et al
as 2:2011cv00069
Plaintiff:
Neil James Lieser
Defendant:
James Spencer, David Simmons, Shar Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. USA
as 1:2011cv00096
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Kester
as 1:2010cv01350
Plaintiff:
James Spencer Smith
Defendant:
Stan Kester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Johnson et al
as 1:2010cv01277
Plaintiff:
James Spencer Smith
Defendant:
Benjamin Johnson, Justin Mitchel, Kevin Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Herring v. Spencer et al
as 2:2010cv00106
Plaintiff:
Mario Herring
Defendant:
James Spencer, Shar Mason and Tina Lamp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick Robinson v. Cecelia Janiszewski
as 10-6626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CECELIA JANISZEWSKI, Northern Regional Jail Medical Admin. Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Incorporated, JAMES SPENCER, Northern Regional Jail Administrator, UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, - Doctor working for Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Incorporated and others
Spencer v. Department of Corrections (DOC)
as 1:2009cv02456
Plaintiff:
James Spencer
Defendant:
Department of Corrections (DOC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. MD Correctional Institute, Jessup
as 1:2009cv02431
Plaintiff:
James Spencer
Defendant:
MD Correctional Institute, Jessup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Janiszewski et al
as 5:2009cv00064
Plaintiff:
Patrick Robinson
Defendant:
Cecelia Janiszewski, James Spencer, Unknown Defendant - Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Spencer v. Martinez
as 4:2009cv00932
Petitioner:
James Spencer
Respondent:
Ricardo Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
