Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Johnson, Curtis v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2019cv00692
Defendant:
C.O. Jaime Adkins, Cpt. Rebecca Lenz, Cpt. James Ellsinger and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis W. Johnson
Not Yet Classified:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindell, Nate v. Lutsey, Jean et al
as 3:2019cv00476
Plaintiff:
Nate A. Lindell
Defendant:
Jean Lutsey, Psychologist Todd L. Hamilton, R.N. Mary H. Alsteen and others
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson, Curtis v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2019cv00167
Defendant:
C.O. Jaime Adkins, Cpt. Rebecca Lenz, Cpt. James Ellsinger and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis W. Johnson
Undetermined:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beene, William v. Jess, Cathy et al
as 3:2019cv00122
Defendant:
Sgt. Weicker, Cathy Jess, C.O. Paul and others
Plaintiff:
William Beene
Undetermined:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford, Cordell v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Kevin A. Carr, C.O. Anthony Matushak, John Doe #1 and others
Undetermined:
GBCI Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Cordell Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. USA et al
as 2:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
Tony L Hamilton
Defendant:
USA and K Brister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02374
Petitioner:
Christopher L Hamilton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robert Hamilton v. Don Strahota
as 16-3859
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT L. HAMILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
DON STRAHOTA, Warden
Allen v. Hearns et al
as 5:2016cv01514
Plaintiff:
Alonzo E Allen
Defendant:
Staff of David Wade Correctional Center, Pamela Hearns, Bruce Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Premo
as 6:2016cv01886
Petitioner:
Albert L. Hamilton
Unknown:
Lisa Hay
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
