Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Gregory Davis v. USA
as 14-10792
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY LEWIS DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Darryl Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corr, et al
as 13-12350
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL LEWIS DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Darryl Davis v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 13-10505
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL LEWIS DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Calvin Lewis Davis v. Dr. Richard O. Broadwell, III
as 13-6077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN LEWIS DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. RICHARD O. BROADWELL, III
Hill et al v. Department of Justice et al
as 5:2012cv05008
Plaintiff:
David Charles Hill
Defendant:
Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals, Lewis Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv01247
Petitioner:
Darryl Lewis Davis
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv01248
Petitioner:
Darryl Lewis Davis
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 6:2012cv00165
Petitioner:
Darryl Lewis Davis
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. TUCKER
as 3:2012cv00044
Petitioner:
DARRYL LEWIS DAVIS
Respondent:
KENNETH S TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2011cv00760
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lewis Davis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
