Cases 21 - 30 of 115
Darryl Robinson v. Ivona Rairigh, et al
as 17-1696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL A. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
IVONA RAIRIGH, Hearing Officer in their official and personal capacity and UNKNOWN MAULDIN, named as Sergeant in their official and personal capacity
Olandio Ray Workman v. Dorothy Manigault
as 17-6566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLANDIO RAY WORKMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DOROTHY A. MANIGAULT, GREENVILLE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, JOHN INGLIS MAULDIN and others
Darryl Robinson v. Ivona Rairigh, et al
as 17-1437
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL A. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
IVONA RAIRIGH, Hearing Officer in their official and personal capacity and UNKNOWN MAULDIN, named as Sergeant in their official and personal capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv02104
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 USC 1651a - All Writs Act
Derousseau v. Judd et al
as 8:2017cv00071
Plaintiff:
Chenel Derousseau
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Auburndale Police Department, FNU Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bishop v. Raul Lopez, et al
as 16-17352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BISHOP
Defendant - Appellee:
RAUL LOPEZ, Warden, J. GERMOND, C. RODRIGUEZ and others
Workman v. Manigault et al
as 6:2016cv04002
Plaintiff:
Orlandio Ray Workman
Defendant:
Dorothy Manigault, Greenville County Public Defenders Office, John I Mauldin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Derousseau v. Judd et al
as 8:2016cv03357
Plaintiff:
Chenel Derousseau
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Gould, Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derousseau v. Judd et al
as 6:2016cv02080
Plaintiff:
Chenel Derousseau
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Gould, Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfred Mauldin v. TN
as 16-6625
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALFRED LEE MAULDIN
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
