Cases 21 - 30 of 243
Carl D. Stevenson v. Ct. Board of Parole et al
as 2:2022cv06823
Petitioner:
Carl D. Stevenson
Respondent:
Ct. Board of Parole and Warden R. C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Gates et al
as 3:2022cv50299
Plaintiff:
Carl Jones
Defendant:
A. S. Gates, R. C. Redel, T. D. Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathan D. Phillips v. R. C. Johnson
as 2:2022cv05998
Petitioner:
Nathan D. Phillips
Respondent:
R. C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
R.V. Coleman v. R.C. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv05977
Plaintiff:
R. V. Coleman
Defendant:
R. C. Johnson, J. Knight, M. Fordham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Darnell Clemons v. R.C. Johnson
as 2:2022cv05719
Petitioner:
Rodney Darnell Clemons
Respondent:
R. C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rafael Alejandro Perez v. R. C. Johnson
as 2:2022cv05694
Petitioner:
Rafael Alejandro Perez
Respondent:
R. C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lanham v. Fortier et al
as 2:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Dennis F. Lanham
Defendant:
M. C. Fortier, R. C. Montagu and M. W. OAKLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darryl Walker v. California Supreme Court et al
as 2:2022cv04638
Petitioner:
Darryl Walker
Respondent:
California Supreme Court and R. C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ingram v. Cheetham et al
as 5:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Terry Ingram
Defendant:
R. C. Cheetham, FNU Clements, FNU Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Marcus Ellington v. R. Johnson
as 22-55577
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARCUS RUBEN ELLINGTON
Respondent / Appellee:
R. C. JOHNSON, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
