Cases 21 - 30 of 644
Thornton v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Charles E Thornton
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Huges et al
as 1:2024cv01632
Plaintiff:
Perry Henderson
Defendant:
Latoya Huges, Rob Jeffreys, Charles Truitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munson v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
James Munson
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Steve Meeks, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spivey v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
Ray Charles Spivey
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Mindi Nurse, Tilden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talidis v. IDOC et al
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
James B Talidis
Defendant:
IDOC, Rob Jeffreys, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trail v. Jeffreys
as 4:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
Aubrey C. Trail
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirk Robinson v. Taggart Boyd, et al
as 24-1392
Petitioner:
Kirk D. Robinson
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd, Warden of RTC and Rob Jeffreys, Director of Corrections, Nebraska
Clifton v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Casey B. Clifton
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirk Robinson v. Taggart Boyd, et al
as 24-1033
Petitioner:
Kirk D. Robinson
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd, Warden of RTC and Rob Jeffreys, Director of Corrections, Nebraska
Cody v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Gregory S. Cody
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
