Cases 21 - 30 of 742
Macias-Robles v. USA
as 3:2024cv00180
Petitioner:
Luis Raymundo Macias-Robles
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Onofre Serrano v. R. Bar et al
as 2:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Onofre Tommy Serrano
Defendant:
R. Bar, Casey Charles Mulholland, D Angelo Jerome Darby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newman et al v. Smith County, Texas et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Brian Newman, Latosha Newman, Joyce Newman and others
Defendant:
Smith County, Texas, Sheriff Larry R Smith, John Shoemaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Slayton v. Harris County, TX et al
as 4:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Defendant:
Harris County, TX, Katrina Comacho, Ms. O and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Venable v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Maurice L. Venable
Defendant:
St. Andre, Harwood, M. Robles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Chloe v. Ottawa County OH, Clerk of Courts, et al
as 24-3019
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ANTOINE CHLOE
Defendant:
OTTAWA COUNTY OH, CLERK OF COURTS, KATELYN RITZLER, Court Administrator, BRUCE ALAN WINTERS, Ottawa County Associate Judge and others
(HC) Perez-Robles v. Pratt
as 2:2023cv03044
Petitioner:
Fermin Perez-Robles
Respondent:
Glen Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robles v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01748
Plaintiff:
Maribel Amaya Robles
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yablonsky v. Alford et al
as 3:2023cv02235
Plaintiff:
John Henry Yablonsky
Defendant:
Alford, Mondet, Steadman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles v. LNU
as 1:2023cv01007
Plaintiff:
Andrew Robles
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
