Cases 21 - 30 of 76
Lance Howard v. Stanley Knight, et al
as 17-3364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
STANLEY KNIGHT, Superintendent, SCOTT ROLLAND, Sergeant, OFFICER GULLEDGE and others
Shelton v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv08043
Petitioner:
Dwight Rolland Shelton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Allotey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01161
Petitioner:
Rolland Allotey
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOWARD v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2017cv03325
Defendant:
GULLEDGE, STANLEY KNIGHT, MEAD and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vincent Solomon v. Ines Castaneda, et al
as 17-16498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT U. SOLOMON
Defendant - Appellee:
INES CASTANEDA, S. SANCHEZ, A. BANKS and others
Rolland Towles v. Bob Mendle, et al
as 17-11118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROLLAND SEAN TOWLES
Defendant - Appellee:
BOB MENDLE, DR. SIDDIQ, JESSICA DUFFELL, Health Services Administrator, Bullock Correctional Facility and others
Towles v. Myers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Rolland Sean Towles
Defendant:
Walter Myers, Jefferson Dunn and Captain Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Towles v. Mobile Co Circuit Court et al
as 1:2017cv00014
Plaintiff:
Rolland Sean Towles
Defendant:
Mobile Co Circuit Court, District Atty Office, DART Restitution Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poore v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00728
Petitioner:
Brett Rolland Poore
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hannah v. Rolland et al
as 3:2016cv03165
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hannah
Defendant:
Bobbie Jo Rolland, Jim Vazzi, Cory Bilyeu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
