Cases 21 - 30 of 485
Elizabeth Carley v. Romeo Aranus, et al
as 23-15271
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH CARLEY
Defendant / Appellant:
ROMEO ARANUS
Defendant:
NEVEN, Warden, GENTRY, Warden, DZURENDA, Director and others
Veasley v. Corwin et al
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Romeo Denzell Veasley
Defendant:
Clint Corwin, Luke Binter, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Mulder v. Marks, et al
as 23-15090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD J. MULDER
Defendant / Appellee:
MARKS, Dr., NAUGHTON, Dr., ROMEO ARANAS and others
Dante Pattison v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 23-15066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE HANALEI PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN SANDOVAL, ISIDRO BACA, Warden, PETERSON, Doctor; 32 - suggestion of death and others
Sam McFarland v. Charles Daniels, et al
as 22-17016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAM MCFARLAND
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DANIELS, MD MICHAEL MINEV, DR. HANF and others
Shawn Flynn v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 22-16995
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN FLYNN
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden, ROMEO ARANAS and others
Mosley v. Officer Young
as 1:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
Romeo Donzell Mosley, Sr
Defendant:
Officer Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Green v. Romeo Aranas, et al
as 22-16926
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES HENRY GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
ROMEO ARANAS, RENE BAKER, JAMES COX and others
Hardin v. Hartog et al
as 4:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
Romeo Hardin
Defendant:
Dan Hartog, Randy Gibbs, Tripp and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos Ovalle v. Orange County Sheriff Department et al
as 8:2022cv02198
Plaintiff:
Santos Ovalle
Defendant:
Orange County Sheriff Department, Deputy Martinez, Doctor Holstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
