Cases 21 - 30 of 173
Clinton v. Groh et al
as 5:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Clinton
Defendant:
Gina M. Groh, Robert W. Trumble, Anna Krasinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dukes v. Mutter
as 5:2022cv00180
Petitioner:
Steven Jacob Dukes
Respondent:
Scott Mutter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hurt v. Tate
as 5:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Hurt
Defendant:
D. Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Stevens Correctional Center et al
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Matthew Allen Taylor
Defendant:
Stevens Correctional Center, McDowell County Correctional Center, McDowell County Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woody v. Southern Regional Jail and Correctional Center et al
as 5:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Percy Ryshawn Woody
Defendant:
Southern Regional Jail and Correctional Center, Fleshman, Merithith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stevens
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kokinda v. Foster et al
as 3:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jason Steven Kokinda
Defendant:
Cprl. T.H. Foster, Ptlm. K.A. Shiflett, Cprl. S.P. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jessup v. Sandy et al
as 1:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Hunter Jessup
Defendant:
Jeff S. Sandy, Betsy Jividen, John Sheeley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Bob Barker Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00436
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Williams
Defendant:
Bob Barker Incorporated, 'Doe' Murphy, Lieutenant David Cavendish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Canterbury et al
as 1:2021cv00469
Plaintiff:
Amos Gabriel Hicks
Defendant:
Steven D. Canterbury, Booker T. Stephens, Francine Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
