Cases 21 - 30 of 109
Boyd v. USA 2255
as 1:2018cv00446
Petitioner:
Steven B. Boyd, Jr.
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Newton v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2017cv02894
Defendant:
Michael G. Giles, Joseph Lombardo, State of Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
Shelly J Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Winslow v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2017cv02374
Defendant:
Dwayne Deal, James Dzurenda, Jo Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Romario Winslow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wide v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2017cv02142
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Eighth Judicial, Jo Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Wide, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kurtze v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2017cv00566
Plaintiff:
Giovanni K Kurtze
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, State of Nevada and Steven B. Wolfson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWLING v. JORDAN et al
as 1:2017cv00493
Plaintiff:
STEVEN B. BOWLING
Defendant:
CORIZON, JANE DOE #1, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. Whittington
as 3:2016cv01327
Petitioner:
Mervin Gale Rhodes
Respondent:
Steven B. Whittington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Krukowski v. United States et.al,
as 2:2016cv02445
Respondent:
Robert Berg, Clark County, Clark County Detention Center and others
Petitioner:
Ashton Krukowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWLING v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv01913
Petitioner:
STEVEN B. BOWLING
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maurice Brown v. Steven Duncan, et al
as 16-2925
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN B. DUNCAN, Chief Administrative Officer, Warden, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, I.D.O.C's Director, MARY WEAVER, Assignment/Placement Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
