Cases 21 - 30 of 767
Vanaman v. Werner et al
as 4:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Leslie Grey Vanaman
Defendant:
Katherine Werner, James Hayden, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BURRITT v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02106
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BURRITT
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STRICKLAND v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORR. et al
as 1:2023cv01954
Plaintiff:
ARTURO STRICKLAND
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORR. and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 1:2023cv02110
Plaintiff:
CHRIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GALAPO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYERS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv01796
Petitioner:
THOMAS MYERS
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA, KELLI K. JENSEN, KELLY N. BRYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2023cv00473
Petitioner:
DAVID MARTIN
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LUKES v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv01551
Petitioner:
ISAAC LUKES
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
