Cases 21 - 30 of 84
Hammonds v. Cuevas et al
as 1:2017cv23341
Defendant:
Director Thomas Kane, Lieutenant Gwinn, Counselor E. Cuevas and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Leon Hammonds, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stine v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2017cv01961
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Office of Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARROCA v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv01570
Petitioner:
ROBERT W. BARROCA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III and THOMAS KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEWIS v. SESSIONS, ET AL.,
as 3:2017cv05475
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant:
JEFF SESSIONS, THOMAS KANE, CARVAJAL, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MULDROW v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv01347
Plaintiff:
LEALON (AMIR MUSA) MULDROW
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS KANE, IAN CONNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan Dickson v. USA, et al
as 17-2396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN KERR DICKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LORETTA LYNCH, Atty General, MICHAEL D. TAFELSKI, Regional Counsel and others
Baker v. Kane
as 6:2017cv01525
Plaintiff:
John David Baker
Defendant:
Thomas Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 1:2017cv11049
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes, United States Marshals Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baker v. Kane
as 6:2017cv01010
Plaintiff:
John David Baker
Defendant:
Thomas Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STINE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv01127
Plaintiff:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
