Cases 21 - 30 of 38
(PC) Gann v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2019cv01797
Plaintiff:
Oscar Zelaya, Michael Warzek, Thomas Michael Joseph Fox and others
Defendant:
T. Thornton, Valley State Prison, Timothy Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Barr et al
as 3:2019cv00786
Defendant:
Interim Assistant Thomas R. Kane, Attorney General William Barr, Interim Director Kathleen Hawk Sawyer and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Timothy Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anderson v. Stephens County Jail et al
as 2:2019cv00216
Defendant:
Collins Medical Staff, Sheriff Office, Stephens County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. USA
as 1:2019cv01913
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Timothy Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ANDERSON v. STEPHENS COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2019cv00053
Defendant:
Lt Wilson, Stephens County Jail, JOHN AND OR JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. STEPHENS COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2019cv00022
Defendant:
STEPHENS COUNTY JAIL, JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, SHERIFF RANDY SHERLI and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogan v. Marshall County, Kansas, Board of County Commissioners et al
as 2:2019cv02040
Plaintiff:
Brett F. Hogan
Defendant:
David Baier, Daniel A. Hargrave, Marshall County, Kansas, Board of County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. CENTRAL STATE PRISON
as 5:2019cv00007
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ANDERSON
Defendant:
CENTRAL STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. SISK et al
as 3:2018cv00114
Defendant:
SGT TAMMY, CAPTAIN SISK, LT CLAY and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. ELBERT COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2018cv00105
Defendant:
CAPTAIN SHANNON YOUNG, SHERIFF MELVIN ANDREWS, MAJOR CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
