Cases 21 - 30 of 755
Yong v. Unkown Agents of The United States Parole Commission et al
as 9:2021cv03103
Plaintiff:
Gong Yong, Yong, Gong and Yong Bing Gong
Defendant:
Unkown Agents of The United States Parole Commission, Representative of The Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden FCI Edgefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Gaultieri et al
as 8:2021cv02181
Petitioner:
Jarvis Watts
Respondent:
Bob Gaultieri and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01560
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Merriweather v. Acting Chairman of the United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2021cv00527
Respondent:
Acting Director of the United States Marshals Service, Acting Chairman of the United States Parole Commission and Acting Sheriff of Marion County, Illinois
Petitioner:
Harvey Willard Merriweather
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Minix v. United States Parole Commission
as 4:2021cv00842
Petitioner:
Charlie Minix
Respondent:
The United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ARRINGTON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2021cv00261
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff:
DERREK E. ARRINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02897
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Collins v. United States Parole Commission
as 3:2020cv06051
Petitioner:
Bernest Collins
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PARKS v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2020cv01481
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
MABRY v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2020cv00868
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff:
FRANK MABRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
