Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Vinson v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2018cv02394
Plaintiff:
James Eugene Vinson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Memphis Police Department, Brad Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crawford et al v. Godinez et al
as 3:2018cv01067
Plaintiff:
Anthony Crawford , Gregory Gandy and Howard Tessman
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Ty J. Bates, Randy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Shepherd et al
as 0:2018cv60732
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lilrod Ford
Defendant:
Shepherd, Love and Unnamed Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vogel v. Sr Warden et al
as 4:2016cv03547
Plaintiff:
George Vogel
Defendant:
Sr Warden and Unnamed Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Marion County, Florida et al
as 5:2016cv00615
Plaintiff:
Willie Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Marion County, Florida, Marion County Sheriff's Office, Chris Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Fisher et al
as 4:2016cv00100
Plaintiff:
Walter Cornelius Lewis
Defendant:
Marshal Fisher, Page, Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARCHAMBAULT v. UNNAMED OFFICER
as 1:2015cv01935
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. ARCHAMBAULT
Defendant:
UNNAMED OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Nicklas v. Jackson County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2015cv00398
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Nicklas
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff Department, Mike Ezell, Unnamed Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Warden et al
as 5:2015cv01276
Plaintiff:
Randeep Singh Mann
Defendant:
Warden, Clinical Director, Health Services Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANN v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2015cv00358
Defendant:
CLINICAL DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICES COORDINATOR, UNKNOWN AND AS YET UNNAMED OFFICERS and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
