Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Jackson (ID 117934) v. Johnson County Sheriff's Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv03211
Defendant: Leawood, Kansas, City of, Johnson County Sheriff's Department, Wyandotte County Unified Government and others
Plaintiff: Marcus Shamillyon Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanderpool (ID 91131) v. Zmuda We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv03184
Petitioner: Michael A. Vanderpool
Respondent: Jeff Zmuda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Yuhas v. Vanderpool et al
as 6:2020cv00613
Plaintiff: John M. Yuhas
Defendant: Sgt. James Vanderpool and Warden Deborah Cockrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanderpool v. Korneman
as 4:2020cv00336
Respondent: Sherie Korneman
Petitioner: James Dean Vanderpool
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vanderpool v. Terri
as 2:2020cv04017
Plaintiff: James Dean Vanderpool
Defendant: Caleb Terri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis III v. Gibson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00610
Plaintiff: Relmon H. Davis, III
Defendant: J. Vanderpool, Corcoran State Prison Trust Office, F Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovaglio v. NYC Police Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv02023
Plaintiff: Peter Lovaglio
Defendant: NYC Police Dept., Josh Vanderpool, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanderpool v. USA
as 3:2017cv01976
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Aaron Lee Vanderpool
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Vanderpool (ID 91131) v. Norwood We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv03079
Plaintiff: Michael A. Vanderpool
Defendant: Joe Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin Vanderpool v. Mark Nooth
as 17-35341
Petitioner - Appellant: AUSTIN EMORY VANDERPOOL
Respondent - Appellee: MARK NOOTH, Superindendant Snake River Correctional Institute

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?