Cases 21 - 30 of 233
Davis v. Rardin et al
as 0:2023cv00651
Petitioner:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Jared Rardin, Colette S. Peters and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Brady, et al
as 22-1448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE JILL BRADY, JESSICA AGGSON, DAVID CHAPIN and others
US v. William Davis, Jr.
as 22-7399
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Davis v. Rardin et al
as 0:2022cv02854
Petitioner:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Jared Rardin, Merrick Garland and Colett S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Brady et al
as 1:2022cv03216
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Judge Jill Brady, Jessica Aggson, David Chapin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Penitentiary McCreary, et al
as 22-5855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY MCCREARY, AI UNIT MANAGER CLARK, COUNSELOR KEITH and others
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Penitentiary McCreary, et al
as 22-5857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY MCCREARY, AI UNIT MANAGER CLARK, COUNSELOR KEITH and others
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Penitentiary McCreary, et al
as 22-5692
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY MCCREARY, AI UNIT MANAGER CLARK, COUNSELOR KEITH and others
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Penitentiary McCreary, et al
as 22-5717
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY MCCREARY, AI UNIT MANAGER CLARK, COUNSELOR KEITH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1705
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
