Cases 31 - 40 of 321
ARCHER v. NICHOLAS et al
as 2:2023cv00898
Petitioner:
JESSICA ARCHER
Respondent:
WENDY NICHOLAS and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FAYETTE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barbian v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J Barbian
Defendant:
Steven R Johnson, Rick Freeze, Deidra Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. HSU Manager Archer et al
as 1:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
Douglas Mack Carroll
Defendant:
HSU Manager Archer, Lt Maucaully, Lt Card and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Archer Lee Evans
Defendant:
TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv01735
Petitioner:
Archer Lee Evans
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Ross v. Tyler Blewett, et al
as 23-35298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR ROSS
Defendant / Appellee:
TYLER BLEWETT, KEN JESKE, SHAWN HAYWOOD and others
Warzyn v. Archer et al
as 2:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Samuel Brooks Warzyn
Defendant:
Dwilette Archer and DCI Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Archer v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 23-1775
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. ARCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Rivera v. Burton et al
as 2:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Juan Rivera, Jr
Defendant:
RN Margie R Burton, Dr Nathan Tapio, Dwillette Archer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Archer v. Wexford Health Source Inc et al
as 1:2023cv01090
Plaintiff:
Andre Archer
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source Inc, Andrew Tilden, Cheryl Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
