Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 132
ARNOLD et al v. ROZIJIA et al
as 2:2021cv00447
Plaintiff: KEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant: ROZIJIA, CHAPLIN ROGERS, OFFICER RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLOWERS v. WATSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00402
Plaintiff: GEORGE LEROY CLOWERS
Defendant: T.J. WATSON, A. FRENCH, B. CARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNIGAN v. RAJOLI et al
as 2:2021cv00311
Plaintiff: LEE EVANS DUNIGAN
Defendant: NAVEEN RAJOLI, KIM HOBSON, AMY WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASHLOCK v ROGATNICK et al
as 2:2021cv00286
Defendant: WALTER BRYAN ASHLOCK, ROGATNICK, CINDY MCGEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCHREANE v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00251
Defendant: G. PETERS, T.J. WATSON, G. GORE and others
Plaintiff: CLARENCE D. SCHREANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SIMS v. VANSCHOYCK et al
as 2:2021cv00230
Defendant: KELLY INDA, SHAKEFER, BENNETH and others
Plaintiff: JOHN SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMS v. SCANLON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00214
Defendant: RICHARDSON, MARK, CHANG and others
Plaintiff: JOHN SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LINTZ v. SIMS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00113
Defendant: SIMS and SARA CLARKE
Plaintiff: DAKOTA LINTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIES v. SIMS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00103
Plaintiff: JOSHUA JAMES DAVIES
Defendant: PARR, LEVI SIMS, RICHARD BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLMAN v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00039
Petitioner: ERIC ANTHONY TILLMAN, JR.
Respondent: B. LAMMER, J. SIMS, FCC TERRE HAUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?