Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Morley v. Elliott et al
as 2:2009cv01554
Petitioner:
Carlos Adrian Morley
Respondent:
Yolanda Elliott, Andrew Thomas and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramsdell v. Thomas
as 2:2009cv00951
Petitioner:
Keith W Ramsdell
Respondent:
Andrew Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Damian Dudley v. County of Maricopa, et al
as 09-15165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIAN L. DUDLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF MARICOPA, JOE ARPAIO, Sheriff of Maricopa County, ANDREW THOMAS, County Attorney and others
Templar v. Moody et al
as 2:2008cv02217
Plaintiff:
L S Templar
Defendant:
Lauri Ann Moody, Lawrence Moody, David Lee and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dudley v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2008cv02168
Plaintiff:
Damian Dudley
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joe Arpaio, Andrew Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jimenez v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv02041
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Jimenez
Defendant:
Joe Arpaio, Andrew Thomas, Matthew Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wesley v. City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv07133
Plaintiff:
Michael Donnel Wesley
Defendant:
City of New York, Gaines, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kenneth Miller v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 08-16520
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH DEAN MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA SCHRIRO, ANDREW THOMAS and TERRY GODDARD
Lopez-Valenzuela et al v. Maricopa County et al
as 2:2008cv00660
Plaintiff:
Angel Lopez-Valenzuela and Isaac Castro-Armenta
Defendant:
Maricopa County, Joe Arpaio, Andrew Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v Douglas County Department of Corrections Medical Department
as 8:2007cv00401
Plaintiff:
Scott Andrew Thomas
Defendant:
Douglas County Department of Corrections Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
