Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Fowlkes v. Dennehy, et al
as 09-1057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELIPE OTEZE FOWLKES
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN M. DENNEHY, Commissioner, JAMES R. BENDER, Assistant Deputy Commissioner, TIMOTHY HALL, Assistant Deputy Commissioner and others
Muhammad v. United States, et al
as 08-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
C. ELI-JAH HAKEEM MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Christopher Mitchell
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and J. COOPER, FCC Florence Financial Manager
Muhammad v. Wiley
as 08-1383
Petitioner - Appellant:
C. ELI-JAH HAKEEM MUHAMMAD, AKA Christopher Mitchell
Respondent - Appellee:
R. WILEY, ADX Warden
Tyson v. Tanner et al
as 2:2008cv04599
Plaintiff:
Antonio Tyson
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, William Deering, Christopher Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Muhammad v. Wiley
as 08-1351
Petitioner - Appellant:
C. ELI-JAH HAKEEM MUHAMMAD, AKA Christopher Mitchell
Respondent - Appellee:
R. WILEY, ADX Warden
Spencer, Jr. v. Bender et al
as 1:2008cv11528
Plaintiff:
Barry H. Spencer, Jr.
Defendant:
James Bender, Harold Clark, Timothy Hall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Buckman v. Clark et al
as 1:2008cv11315
Plaintiff:
Sean Buckman
Defendant:
Harold C. Clark, Christopher Mitchell, Luis Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Muhammad v. United States, et al
as 08-1200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
C. ELI-JAH HAKEEM MUHAMMAD, AKA Christopher Mitchell
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, (D.O.J.), H. G. LAPPIN, BOP Director and others
Santiago v. Piermarini et al
as 1:2008cv10049
Plaintiff:
Jose Santiago
Defendant:
Sherri Piermarini, Frances Rivard, Warren Rhone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fowlkes v. Dennehy et al
as 1:2007cv12009
Plaintiff:
Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Defendant:
Kathleen M. Dennehy, James R. Bender, Timothy Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
