Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Walker v. Kansas City Kansas Police Department et al
as 5:2017cv03073
Plaintiff:
Walter P. Walker
Defendant:
Kansas City Kansas Police Department, (fnu) Ziggler, Jeffery Pewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redd v. Mann et al
as 1:2017cv01325
Plaintiff:
Terry Redd
Defendant:
Jeffrey Mann and Correct Care Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eastman v. Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00659
Defendant:
Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc., Correct Care Solutions, Inc., Matthew Killough and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Eastman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Rios et al
as 5:2017cv00167
Plaintiff:
Chad Jeremy Adams
Defendant:
Hector Rios, Jr, GEO Group Inc, Dean Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldsmith v. Kim et al
as 1:2017cv00256
Plaintiff:
Robert Goldsmith
Defendant:
Kim, Jennifer Briscoe and Correct Care Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher v. Coastal Bend Detention Center et al
as 2:2016cv00516
Plaintiff:
Julius Calvin Christopher
Defendant:
Coastal Bend Detention Center, Correct Care Solutions, Inc., GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunyan v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv02103
Plaintiff:
James M. Dunyan
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John Wetzel, Douglas Bopp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Correct Care Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01259
Plaintiff:
Calvin Williams
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Inc., Khatri, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pew v. Keldie et al
as 3:2016cv00891
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Defendant:
Carl Keldie, Correct Care Solutions, Inc. and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pew v. Correct Care Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00729
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Percy Pew
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Inc., John Does and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
