Cases 31 - 40 of 171
Smith v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2020cv01150
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2020mc00032
Petitioner:
Charles Smith
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Bradley et al
as 5:2020cv00039
Defendant:
Dr. Walker, Pelicia Hall, Ms. Toomey and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon-Henry v. Cooper et al
as 3:2019cv00867
Defendant:
Tyler Casey, Robert Watts, Joshua Lindblom and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jaron Cannon-Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Washington
as 3:2019cv00826
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Unknown Washington
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Brooks et al
as 3:2019cv00774
Defendant:
Latasha Brooks, Tirah Mixon, Vivian Evans and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pullen v. Broughton et al
as 1:2019cv00811
Defendant:
C.O. Baker, Charles Smith, C.O. Engelhardt and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Tyrone Pullen, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv03157
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Coltart v. State of Texas, et al
as 6:2019cv00464
Defendant:
Thu Le, Olsson LNU, John Doe #5 and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Scott Coltart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States District Court et al
as 5:2019cv03139
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
United States District Court, Larned State Hospital, Justin (lnu) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
