Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Vaughn v. Foust et al
as 4:2018cv00062
Plaintiff:
Benny Vaughn
Defendant:
Cody Foust, Coffee County, Tennessee and Garrett Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allsopp v. Hare et al
as 4:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Allsopp
Defendant:
Coffee County, Tennessee and Matthew Hare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillip v. Coffee County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2018cv00004
Plaintiff:
Phillip Roberts
Defendant:
Coffee County, Tennessee, John Carroll, Chase Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Collins et al
as 4:2017cv00062
Plaintiff:
Michael Rose
Defendant:
Tristan Collins, Matthew Hare and Coffee County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Coffee County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jones
Defendant:
Coffee County, Tennessee and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allsopp v. Foust et al
as 4:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Allsopp
Defendant:
Cody Foust and Coffee County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brazelton v. Coffee County Sherriff Department
as 4:2017cv00036
Plaintiff:
Quintus Travino Brazelton
Defendant:
Coffee County Sheriff Department, Steven Graves, Danny Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Mayberry-Buckner Enterprises, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00812
Plaintiff:
Garieon J. Simmons
Defendant:
Mayberry-Buckner Enterprises, LLC, Timmy Mark Kilgore, Manchester, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Coffee County Sheriff's Department et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2017cv00201
Plaintiff:
Bernard Miller
Defendant:
Coffee County Sheriff's Department, Lt. Rouse, Sgt. Pryor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Tift County Jail et al
as 5:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Ryan Harris
Defendant:
Tift County Jail and Coffee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
