Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Gilley v. Cullman County District Attorneys Office
as 4:2013cv00582
Plaintiff:
Dale William Gilley, Jr
Defendant:
Cullman County District Attorneys Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorenzo Williams, Sr. v. Richard Newman
as 13-6136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORENZO DALE WILLIAMS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD K. NEWMAN, M. BYRUM, Officer of Hopewell Police Department, S. PAK, Officer at Hopewell Police Department and others
Dale Gilley, Jr. v. Carter Davenport, et al
as 13-10371
Petitioner - Appellant:
DALE WILLIAM GILLEY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
CARTER DAVENPORT and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Williams v. Newman et al
as 1:2012cv01475
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Dale Williams, SR.
Defendant:
M. Byrum, S. Pak, W. Blankenship and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilley v. Davenport et al
as 5:2012cv03919
Petitioner:
Dale William Gilley, Jr
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roger Williams, Jr. v. Rick Coursey
as 11-35943
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER DALE WILLIAMS, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK COURSEY
Dale Williams, Sr. v. Cal Ludeman, et al
as 11-2694
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dale Williams, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Cal R. Ludeman, Commissioner of Human Services and James Arneson, Supervisor, Polk County Social Services, in their individual and official capacities
Gilley v. Hetzel et al
as 5:2011cv00767
Petitioner:
Dale William Gilley
Respondent:
Hetzel and Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Ludeman et al
as 0:2010cv03041
Plaintiff:
Dale Williams
Defendant:
Cal Ludeman, James Aberhamson and Polk County Social Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Sherrod
as 3:2010cv00398
Petitioner:
Dale William Burke
Respondent:
W A Sherrod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
