Cases 31 - 40 of 935
Robertson v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3030
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JAMES ROBERTSON
Defendant:
STATE OF KANSAS, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROGER WERHOLTZ and others
Erwin v. Zmuda, et al
as 24-3022
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADAM ERWIN
Defendant:
JEFF ZMUDA, LIBBY KEOGH, DARCIE HOLTHOUS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Wright v. LNU et al
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Anthony T Wright
Defendant:
FNU LNU and FNU Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. New Mexico Attorney General
as 1:2024cv00137
Petitioner:
Andrew Nicholas May
Respondent:
New Mexico Attorney General and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kellogg v. Aguilera et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Kellogg
Defendant:
Tony Aguilera, Jace Gilley, Cole Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. LNU 5:24-CV-035-H
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Matthew Quinton Sanchez
Respondent:
FNU LNU 5:24-CV-035-H
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
LNU v. Ellis County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
FNU LNU 3:24-cv-086 and Demas Green
Respondent:
Ellis County Sheriff, Ellis County Sheriff's Office, Ellis County Jailers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley v. Hiniger et al
as 5:2024ct03021
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Lewis Dudley
Defendant:
Damon Hiniger, Clayton Johnson, Terrence Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muniz v. Hendrix et al
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Mary Muniz
Defendant:
FNU Hendrix, Lubbock County Detention Center and FNU LNU 5:24-CV-027 (1)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
