Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Cooper v. Sowers et al
as 1:2013cv03872
Plaintiff:
Robert Cooper
Defendant:
Roderick R. Sowers, J Michael Stouffer, Bobby P. Shearin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childs v. Cate et al
as 3:2013cv02633
Plaintiff:
Earl Childs, Jr.
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Paramo, Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray Medina v. B. Morris, et al
as 13-55617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAY MEDINA
Defendant - Appellee:
B. MORRIS, Facility Captain at RJD, D. K. MCBRIDE, Associate Warden of RJD, P. A. CORTEZ, Correctional Counselor at RJD and others
McDonald v. Smith et al
as 1:2012cv00926
Plaintiff:
Issac L. McDonald
Defendant:
K. Smith, K. Payne, J. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathaniel Jackson v. Lieutenant Willis, et al
as 12-3030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT WILLIS, Prison Guard, Logan Correctional Center and EDDIE J. PAYNE, Prison Guard, Pinckneyville Prison
Nathaniel Jackson v. Lieutenant Willis, et al
as 12-2861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT WILLIS and EDDIE J. PAYNE
Damien Taylor v. James Graves, et al
as 12-1773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN LAMAR TAYLOR, aka Damien Taylor
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. GRAVES, Circuit Judge, JOHN PRELESNIK, Warden, K. A. KRICK, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
Gerald Payne v. Timothy Virga
as 12-15808
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERALD J. PAYNE
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY VIRGA
Taylor #262737 v. Graves et al
as 2:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
Damien Taylor #262737
Defendant:
James M. Graves, Jr., John Prelesnik, K. A. Krick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Willis et al
as 3:2012cv03023
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jackson
Defendant:
. Willis and Eddie J. Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
