Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Welch et al v. United States et al
as 1:2012cv02238
Plaintiff:
Edward Welch, John Roosevelt Baccus, Patrick Strozier and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Benita Y. Pearson, Thomas J. McAvoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabriel Toader v. JPvMorgan Chase Bank, et al
as 11-3091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GABRIEL D. TOADER
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Bank of New York Mellon v. Christopher Stoller
as 10-3295
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as Successor to JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. As Trustee for Holders of Sami II Trust 2006-AR7 formerly known as BANK OF NEW YORK, THE
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER STOLLER
Toader v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 1:2009cv06684
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Dragos Toader
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank and Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Kissi v. Pramco II, LLC
as 09-7612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, LLC, DLA PIPER, of Maryland and New York, VENABLE LLP, of Maryland and New York and others
David Kissi v. Pramco II, et al
as 09-3281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, DLA PIPER, of MD and NY, VENABLE LLP, of MD and NY and others
Kissi v. Pramco II LLC et al
as 8:2009cv01934
Plaintiff:
David Kissi
Defendant:
Pramco II LLC, DLA Piper, Venable LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Kissi v. Pramco II, LLC
as 09-6556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, LLC, DLA PIPER, MD and NY, VENABLE, of MD and NY and others
David Kissi v. Pramco II, et al
as 09-1685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, DLA PIPER, of MD and NY, VENABLE LLP, of MD and NY and others
Kissi v. Pramco II LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00133
Plaintiff:
David Kissi
Defendant:
Pramco II LLC, DLA Piper, Venable LLP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
