Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Jones v. Cooper et al
as 8:2009cv02111
Plaintiff:
Carl Lamel Jones
Defendant:
James Cooper, Jason Johnson and State Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Cooper v. C. Zych
as 09-2128
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES COOPER
Respondent - Appellee:
C. ZYCH
Davis v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2009cv01450
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Keith Davis
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Lynn Cooper, Blane Lachney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Zych
as 5:2009cv11620
Petitioner:
James Cooper
Respondent:
C Zych
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Larry Wimberly v. County of Sacramento, et al
as 09-15706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY WIMBERLY
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Political Subdivision of the Sate of California, SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, a Political Subdivision of Sacramento, LOU BLANAS, Sheriff and others
Parnell v. SC, State of et al
as 2:2008cv03354
Plaintiff:
Christopher Parnell
Defendant:
SC, State of, James Cooper, Philip Newsome and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Phillips et al v. Speight et al
as 1:2008cv04389
Plaintiff:
John Phillips
Defendant:
Yancy Brown, Timothy Speight, Ted Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Damm v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2008cv01074
Plaintiff:
Gregory Damm
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Lynn A Cooper, James Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ivan Davis v. Berks Cty, et al
as 08-3026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN B. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES COOPER, JOI FRANKLIN and FRANK GALONIS
Defendant - Non-Participating:
BERKS CTY, BERKS CTY PRISON, BERKS CTY PRISON BD and others
Cooper v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00602
Petitioner:
Henry James Cooper
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
