Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Payne et al v. Prather et al
as 6:2011cv06043
Plaintiff:
Chanikka Davis Payne, C. K. W., K. R. S. and others
Defendant:
J. Christopher Prather, Peter J. Talty, Julian Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. State of California Department of Coreections et al
as 5:2011cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jeff Weaver
Defendant:
State of California Department of Coreections , San Quentin State Prison and K. R. Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barry Jameson et al v. John Marshall et al
as 2:2011cv00184
Defendant:
Belton, Belton, P D Brazelton and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Jameson
Johnson v. Valencia et al
as 2:2010cv02797
Defendant:
Unknown Valencia, K R Magee, E Miranda and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Joanne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Menefield v. Yates et al
as 1:2010cv02406
Plaintiff:
James Fredrick Menefield
Defendant:
James A. Yates , M C Davis , R Fisher, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. Yates, et al.
as 1:2010cv01940
Plaintiff:
Kajauna Kenyatta Irvin
Defendant:
James A. Yates , P. D. Brazelton , K R Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Irvin et al
as 1:2010at00816
Defendant:
Kajauna Kenyatta Irvin, James A. Yates , P. D. Brazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerald Perry v. John Holmes, et al
as 10-20619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD ALLEN PERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN B HOLMES, Former District Attorney of Harris County, STEVE BALDASSANO, Former Assistant District Attorney of Harris County, BOYOL SMITH, Sergeant and others
Alfredrick Love v. K. Hensley, et al
as 10-55707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFREDRICK LOVE
Defendant - Appellee:
K. R. HENSLEY, Correctional Officer, K. WOOD, Corrections Sgt., T. OCHOA, Deputy Warden and others
Conner v. Cruse et al
as 3:2009cv04650
Plaintiff:
Scott Eric Conner
Defendant:
K. R. Cruse, D. Melton, B. Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
