Cases 31 - 40 of 131
KING v. CAVALLO et al
as 5:2019cv01005
Defendant:
AMBER MOLL, UPTOWN TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, RDG PA, OFFICER MATTHEW CAVALLO and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. State Of Florida et al
as 2:2019cv00119
Defendant:
State Of Florida and Fort Myers Police Department
Plaintiff:
Sammy L King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. SAMUELS et al
as 5:2019cv00200
Defendant:
SGT. BRANDIT and NICOLE D. SAMUELS
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLOPPY v. JONES et al
as 4:2019cv00013
Plaintiff:
LEE SLOPPY
Defendant:
ACOSTA, MICHELLE SCHOUEST, A AEEVEDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis v. The Municipal Court of Wake County et al
as 5:2019hc02002
Respondent:
The Municipal Court of Wake County, Janet M. Leggett, State of N.C. and others
Petitioner:
Egbert Francis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. HAMRICK et al
as 4:2018cv00255
Defendant:
Counselor CHESTER, Warden DWIGHT HAMRICK, Counselor BEACHAM and others
Plaintiff:
SANTWON ANTONIO DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. The Municipal Court of Wake County et al
as 5:2018ct03338
Defendant:
Janet M. Leggett, The Municipal Court of Wake County, Howard Cummings and others
Plaintiff:
Egbert Francis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Montouth et al
as 0:2018cv02856
Defendant:
Aurther Burton, Brian Sterling, M. E. Montouth and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. King and Curtis Lamar King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REED v. CENTURON OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2018cv00472
Defendant:
L MESSER, J FABREGAS-SCHENDLER, L KING and others
Plaintiff:
JASON P REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. VANBILLIARD et al
as 5:2018cv03962
Defendant:
BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM, OFFICER STEPHEN DEW, DANIEL VANBILLIARD and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
