Cases 31 - 40 of 332
Adams v. Layton et al
as 6:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Unknown Layton, Use of Force Office, University of Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAYTON v. MASON et al
as 2:2022cv04442
Petitioner:
SHARIF LAYTON
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DAUPHIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Sharif Layton
as 22-2484
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHARIF LAYTON
McCullough v. Boston et al
as 1:2022cv03201
Plaintiff:
Alaye' S. McCullough
Defendant:
Sherry Boston, Stacey Hydricks, Allison E. Layton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. May et al
as 1:2022cv01062
Petitioner:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Respondent:
Robert May and The Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. May et al
as 1:2022mc00339
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Warden Robert May and Matthew Dutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Vernon et al
as 2:2022cv14275
Plaintiff:
Maximo Gomez
Defendant:
Vernon and K. Layton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. G. Clemens et al
as 3:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
Berlin Vanardo Brown
Defendant:
CCPM G. Clemens, Parole Agent Patia, Correctional Officer Bennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAYTON v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2022cv07089
Plaintiff:
JACK LANE LAYTON
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Penton v. Layton Johnson, et al
as 22-15665
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANTHONY PENTON
Defendant / Appellant:
LAYTON JOHNSON
Defendant:
S. HUBARD, K. POOL, J. WALKER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
