Cases 31 - 40 of 487
Stephen Wlodarz v. Centurion of Tennessee, LLC, et al
as 23-5708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN B. WLODARZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTURION OF TENNESSEE, LLC, EDMUND LANE, M.D. in his individual and official capacities, KENNETH WILLIAMS, Tennessee Department of Corrections Medical Director and others
Berry v. Claude et al
as 3:2023cv02451
Plaintiff:
Teon Berry
Defendant:
Dr Claude, Charles Truitt, Rachel Dodd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00347
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perkins v. Dodd et al
as 3:2023cv01467
Plaintiff:
Antonio R Perkins
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd and W Loy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blazer v. Martin et al
as 3:2023cv01343
Plaintiff:
Adam Blazer
Defendant:
P. Martin, Rachel Dodd, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Warfel et al
as 3:2023cv01258
Plaintiff:
Staten D. Taylor
Defendant:
Warfel, Lt. Miller, Rachel Dodd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)Orta v. Arviza
as 1:2023cv00588
Petitioner:
Lois Jochinto Orta
Respondent:
M. Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Perkins v. Dodd et al
as 3:2023cv00845
Plaintiff:
Antonio R Perkins
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd and William Loy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maida v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Maida
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Powell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
