Cases 31 - 40 of 58
King v. McEwen
as 3:2012cv05140
Petitioner:
Klinton Michael King
Respondent:
L. S. McEwen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ian King v. Daniel Paramo
as 12-56620
Petitioner - Appellant:
IAN MICHAEL KING
Respondent - Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
King v. Thomas et al
as 3:2012cv00757
Plaintiff:
Michael King
Defendant:
Edwin Thomas, Kenper and Keretsi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eugene Douglas, Jr. v. Gary Maynard
as 12-6440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE DOUGLAS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner and others
King v. Hooper et al
as 5:2011cv03920
Plaintiff:
Jerry Michael King
Defendant:
Hooper, Ackins, D Hunt and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Jefferson v. Shane Wooten
as 11-7128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD W. JEFFERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHANE WOOTEN, Officer, CRAIG WILKINS, Officer, PAUL ZIOLKOWSKI, Lieutenant and others
Traore v. Laquidara et al
as 1:2011cv03486
Plaintiff:
Abdoulaye Traore
Defendant:
Frank Laquidara, Michael King and Assistant District Attorney of Docket Number 2009NY050861 in New York County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sewell v. Warden
as 8:2011cv01094
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel E. Sewell
Defendant:
Warden, Virginia A. Burkhaeart, Kathleen Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snyder v. State's Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2011cv00994
Plaintiff:
Toby Wayne Snyder
Defendant:
State's Attorney's Office, James Robison, Patricia Moulton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Maynard et al
as 8:2011cv00255
Plaintiff:
Eugene Douglas, Jr.
Defendant:
Gary D. Maynard, Dept of Public Safety and Correctional Services, J Michael Stouffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
