Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Dunbar v. McCall et al
as 1:2012cv02683
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dunbar
Defendant:
Micheal McCall, Jr, Lt Bennett, Lt Rodriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richburg v. Alabama Dept. of Corrections, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00803
Plaintiff:
Joshua Richburg
Defendant:
Alabama Dept. of Corrections and Elmore Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richburg v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv01944
Plaintiff:
Joseph Richburg
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Mary Bethea, Steven Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard McFadden v. State of South Carolina
as 10-7130
Petitioner - Appellant:
BERNARD MCFADDEN
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ROBERT RICHBURG, Investigator for Sumter County Police Department and HENRY MCMASTER, South Carolina Attorney General
Nichols v. Heztel et al
as 2:2010cv02170
Plaintiff:
Randy Willard Nichols
Defendant:
Heztel, Gordey, Taylor and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden v. State of South Carolina et al
as 3:2010cv01544
Petitioner:
Bernard McFadden
Respondent:
State of South Carolina, Robert Richburg and Henry McMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richburg v. Williams et al
as 8:2010cv00981
Plaintiff:
James Franklin Richburg
Defendant:
Ken Williams , W T Johnson and Robin Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richburg v. Williams et al
as 2:2010cv00982
Plaintiff:
James Franklin Richburg
Defendant:
Ken Williams, W T Johnson and Robin Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richburg v. Williams et al
as 2:2010cv00981
Plaintiff:
James Franklin Richburg
Defendant:
Ken Williams, W T Johnson and Robin Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron v. Lampley et al
as 2:2010cv00588
Plaintiff:
Thomas Keith Cameron
Defendant:
J Lampley, T Keyes, Richburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
