Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Springer v. Adams et al
as 7:2012cv00336
Defendant:
Sgt. Adams, Sgt. Bentley, C/O Brinkley and others
Plaintiff:
Levi Springer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Cook County et al
as 1:2012cv03306
Plaintiff:
Jonathan C Williams
Defendant:
Cook County, Thomas Dart, Lt Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levi Springer v. Officer Deel
as 11-7506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEVI SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER M. DEEL, SGT. COLLINS and BRIAN HURLEY
Defendant:
SGT. SMITH, WARDEN RAY, SGT. TONY ADAMS and others
Spradley v. City of Klamath et al
as 1:2011cv01074
Defendant:
Deputy Brightman, City of Klamath, Sgt. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
John L. Spradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Cook County, et al
as 1:2011cv04454
Plaintiff:
Jamal Smith
Defendant:
The County of Cook, Thomas J. Dart, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Doe et al
as 1:2011cv01129
Plaintiff:
Kendell Bowman
Defendant:
John Doe, Off. Hand, Off. Stuffen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chisolm v. McElvogue et al
as 4:2011cv00253
Plaintiff:
Don Survi Chisolm
Defendant:
Cliff McElvogue, Lt Riley, Sgt Jacumin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Springer v. Deel et al
as 7:2010cv00256
Defendant:
Sgt. Adams, Sgt. Collins, Officer M. Deel and others
Plaintiff:
Levi Springer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rey v. C.C.D.O.C. Sheriff Deputy et al
as 1:2009cv07843
Plaintiff:
Jorian Rey
Defendant:
C.C.D.O.C. Sheriff Deputy, C/O Pharmaent, C/O Shampayne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharples v. Anderson et al
as 1:2009cv05124
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allen Sharples
Defendant:
Sup. Anderson, Cpt. Darcy, Sgt. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
