Cases 31 - 40 of 888
Saunders v. Holman et al
as 7:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
Daquan Saunders
Defendant:
D.R. Holman, M. Ewing, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Saunders v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 23-2629
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY C. SAUNDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
Donner v. Saunders et al
as 1:2023cv08126
Plaintiff:
Gregory E. Donner
Defendant:
Michael Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2023cv02866
Plaintiff:
Tracy Rodgers
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Jane/John Doe, Ms. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Lockriagh et al
as 7:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Saunders Miles Franklin
Defendant:
Superintendant Lockriagh, C/O Allen, Dottie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Allen et al
as 7:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Saunders Franklin
Defendant:
C/O Allen, Lt. Bay, Lt. Brogran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Angna et al
as 7:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
Saunders Franklin
Defendant:
C/O Angna, Sgt. Barksdale, Lt. Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Jones et al
as 7:2023cv00481
Plaintiff:
Saunders Franklin
Defendant:
Nurse Jones, Dottie, Nurse Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bechtol v. Carter County et al
as 6:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Edward Bechtol
Defendant:
Carter County, Chris Bryant, Harvey Burkhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Lubbock Sheriff's Office
as 5:2023cv00159
Petitioner:
Norman Saunders
Respondent:
Lubbock Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
