Cases 31 - 40 of 330
SHIPMAN v. TWITTY
as 3:2023cv21312
Plaintiff:
SHAVONSKI D SHIPMAN
Defendant:
TWITTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Cody v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 23-2735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steven Donnelle Cody, also known as Steven Cody-Obama
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, ADC, M. Dale Reed, Chief Deputy, ADC, Raymond Naylor, Disciplinary Hearing Administrator/ Director of Internal Affairs Division, ADC and others
Wilson v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv11666
Plaintiff:
Javan Jerrelle Wilson, Sr.
Defendant:
Nathanael Smith, John Doe, Brian Shipman and others
Cage v. Beard et al
as 2:2023cv11575
Defendant:
Jerome Waefield, Curtis Beard, Jill Kline and others
Plaintiff:
Landis Cage
Helloms v. Shipman et al
as 4:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Charles D Helloms
Defendant:
James Shipman, Joseph Mahoney, Maurice Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Shipman et al
as 4:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Reed
Defendant:
James Shipman, Joe McHoney and Leslie McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Sarah Huckabee, Arkansas Division of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Olmos v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 23-15892
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY PAUL OLMOS, named as Timothy Olmos, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES L RYAN, named as Charles Ryan, RICHARD PRATT, MARK SHIPMAN and others
Hobbs v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Harold Hobbs
Defendant:
Dexer Payne, Seamster, Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Davis et al
as 4:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Robertson
Defendant:
Donna Davis, Cynthia Conway, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
