Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Pettigrew v. Dalton et al
as 1:2013cv01319
Plaintiff:
Carey C Pettigrew
Defendant:
. Dalton, . Pierce, .. Zimmerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeBaron v. Meal Mart, et al
as 13-1073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN MARQUIS LEBARON
Defendant - Appellee:
MEAL MART, MEAL MART OWNERS, UNKNOWN MEAL MART EMPLOYEES and others
Interested Party:
DARRON J. SHEROKOW, KEVIN ASHBY, NICHOLAS BASEY and others
LeBaron v. Meal Mart et al
as 1:2012cv11134
Plaintiff:
Nathan Marquis LeBaron
Defendant:
Meal Mart, Meal Mart Owners, Unknown Meal Mart Employees and others
Movant:
Darron J. Sherokow, Keith Ashby, Nicholus Basey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pope v. Bernard, et al
as 10-1443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH POPE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK BERNARD, Lieutenant, KATHLEEN DENNEHY, Commissioner-Department of Corrections, LUIS SPENCER, Siperintendent-MCI Norfolk and others
Moore v. Miller et al
as 3:2008cv03137
Plaintiff:
David L Moore
Defendant:
Jackie Miller, T . Kennedy, . French and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pope v. Kennedy
as 08-1670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH POPE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOAN T. KENNEDY-CONSTANT
Defendant:
LUIS SPENCER, Superintendent-MCI Norfolk, KRISTIE LADOUCER, Department Grievance Coordinator, KATHLEEN DENNEHY, Commissioner-Department of Corrections and others
Stone v. Walker et al
as 3:2008cv03008
Plaintiff:
David Stone
Defendant:
Rodger E Walker, Jr, Guy D Pierce, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Smith et al
as 3:2007cv01156
Plaintiff:
James Alexander Logan
Defendant:
Andrew P. Smith, Michael Riley, T. Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corum v. Sukeena
as 3:2007cv00163
Plaintiff:
James Edward Corum
Defendant:
M. R. Sukeena, C. J. Barnes and R. T. Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
