Cases 31 - 40 of 48
DENSON v. USA
as 4:2011cv00055
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
TONY EDWARD DENSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tony Powell v. Hector Rio
as 10-17760
Petitioner - Appellant:
TONY EDWARD POWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
HECTOR RIOS, Warden
Powell v. Rios
as 1:2010cv01272
Petitioner:
Tony Edward Powell
Respondent:
Hector Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ari Bailey, et al v. American Correctional Assn, et al
as 10-2506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARI BAILEY
Plaintiff:
DAMION NELSON, JASPER JOCKERY, BRANDON SMALLS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSN, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY, DR., ASST. DIRECTOR CORR. PROG. DIV. and others
Ari Bailey, et al v. Harley G. Lappin, et al
as 10-2507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARI BAILEY
Plaintiff:
DAMION NELSON, JASPER JOCKERY, BRANDON SMALLS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSN, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY, DR., ASST. DIRECTOR CORR. PROG. DIV. and others
Tony Edward Queen v. Silvia H. Garcia
as 2:2010cv03529
Respondent:
Silvia H. Garcia
Petitioner:
Tony Edward Queen
BAILEY et al v. AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2010cv01833
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY, DAMION NELSON, JASPER JOCKERY and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, HARELY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY et al v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2010cv01834
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY, DAMION NELSON, JASPER DUCKERY and others
Defendant:
HARELY G. LAPPIN, AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, CONNELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandles v. Thaler
as 1:2010cv00209
Petitioner:
Tony Edwards Sandles
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Garcia et al
as 4:2010cv00797
Plaintiff:
Tony Edwards
Defendant:
Adrian Garcia, G Shaft, Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
